Posted by rAndi on September 27, 2000 at 08:29
In Reply to: A snag posted by Alex on September 27, 2000 at 07:37
I dissagree with you. For those yho want to read all the contributens to this board for free, they will still be able to read them within a month, but the webspace needed for so much material costs money, too. You are not going to pay for the contributins, but only for the storage thereof. Wet Set could just as well simply delete all messages older than a month (and I know of other forums that do just that), instead they conserve them, and it is that service, that we are going to have to pay for. I'm not saying that I like the idea of having to pay for something that was free for so long, but I can understand it.
To WET SET: because of the way in wich some posts tend to dissapear in the archives after a very short time, I think it would be a good Idea to either leave the joungest archive open to all users. Or to change the way the archives work: So not all posts will dissapear at a set date, but instead whenever they are one month old.
Email: andreaas@t-online.de