Posted by Flo on September 24, 2000 at 04:08
In Reply to: Parry and Counterthrust posted by Boss Pee on September 23, 2000 at 16:29
Boss Pee, Debbie's post broke no "rules". It was the sort of post that is common here - check the archives. It was your reply that took the string off on a tangent about the age of consent in the USA - not relevant to a post about knicker-wetting at an English school. Let's keep things on-topic here and they'll be no problems. Yes, I'm guilty of joining in that argument too, instead of commenting directly on the substance of the original post (please re-post it, Debbie, but without the reference to "16" that seems to get so many people's wet knickers in a twist).
I always pick the olives out of my pizza - awful things, so a whole branch of them is something I'll pass on. I'm not into male "accidents", but if you spot any female ones I'd love to read about them (but don't mention the wetters age!).
I still think you're an arrogant "sumbitch", and proud of it too!
p.s. (the boring bits)
The "Category 2" restictions that Wet Set abide by permit the description (text) and depiction (images) of "stronger fetishes" and "revolting and abhorrent phenomena" (the latter more acceptable in text than images). The age limit that would risk pushing these descriptions into the "Refused Classification" category is 16, not 18 (except where actual sexual activity or nudity is involved when the limit is 18).
These rules are deliberately vague but I would guess that descriptions of wetting incidents involving the under 16s would have to be free of any fetishistic associations whatsover. Just straigtforward accounts of true experiences. And that would apply to any replies posted in relation to these accounts.
The glossary of terms in the Australian Regulations aren't much use either. "Stronger fetishes" seems to refer to bondage and discipline
(are they fetishes at all?) whilst "revolting and abhorrent phenomena" are just defined as "fetishes or practices, sometimes accompanied by sexual activity, which are considered offensive".