Posted by Lloyd on December 15, 1998 at 15:21
In Reply to: "Those Little Accidents"??? posted by dejay on December 15, 1998 at 09:43
No! How can you think that's good? I'm sick of seeing these references to ways girls can avoid having to control their bladders, avoid peeing their pants, generally use their 'weak bladders' as reasons to be lazy without consequence. The wearing of pants necessarily implies the possibility and probability of eventual wetting of pants, which is a natural human condition, and woman can learn to deal with this, and even like it. Wetting pants is fun, and there are ways to make wetting more acceptable and less embarrassing (or even just plain hidden). Look at the number of women who enjoy peeing their pants discretely under their skirts - tell me they would learn how wonderful that is if they used pads for their whole lives instead of toilets. Plus there is another aspect to this. I like a woman I'm intimate with to be 'unadulterated', so to speak. There is something tremendously sexy about a woman in a cute pair of pants with nothing in them but the woman.
No, I don't think it's great that women no longer need to use a toilet to pee. It's a shame.
My opinion, of course.
Lloyd.
Email: 100246.2304@compuserve.com