Posted by Annie on April 07, 2005 at 06:01 [81.79.85.62]
Being quite new to this, I hope I don't come across as being a bit thick but there are a few questions I have that I hope someone out there might answer for me.
1.
I noticed the term "troll" has been used a couple of times on this board and wondered if it meant something in particular or if it was just derogatory term such as "cow" or "bitch" or something?
2.
There seems to be concern that some men are masquerading as LG's or female AB's.
I don't really understand why anyone would do that. Surely if you are a man looking for a daddy that has gay connotations?
Therefore when you are finally exposed, the "daddy" you've been talking to is not only NOT going to be interested in a relationship with you, but also will be left feeling pretty sickened by the experience.
With all the stuff out there thats available now, surely there must be a web site dedicated to male ab's (whether wanting to be baby boys or girls) finding their ideal daddy?
Sorry but I don't understand what anyone hopes to achieve by pretending to be something they're not - do they really think they'll find a happy long term relationship by beginning with lies and a fundamental lack of respect?
It just doesn't make sense.
3.
I'd like to understand what it is that a "daddy" gets out of the relationship?
Naturally I understand the things I like about being a baby ie find wearing nappies a turn on, mostly as its humiliating but also find it comforting emotionally to regress to a time when I was safe, looked after and had no responsibility.
I keep reading stuff on sites like this saying that it's all to to with loving and nurturing someone in nappies.
4.
If the above is true then how come you aren't beating the doors down of all the disabled out there that would love to have a partner to love them nurture them and change their nappies?
There has to be more to it than that and I'd love someone to explain it to me.
5.
In one of the more paticularly odious (and lets face it thats an achievement in itself) messages posted by lil wendy in which the author excelled themselves by recollecting a nappy change which included daddy using his urine to clean her up (trying not to be as coarse or revolting as author) if this was a reference to intercourse ie cleaning her insides - forgive me for being thick or naive but I didn't think it was physically possible for a man to urinate with an erection?
Why would anyone want to urinate on their partner? (seems disrespectful) more understandable if baby has accident but Daddy urinating on his baby?
Yuk don't get it
And wouldn't like Daddy to do that to me - don't understand what its all about.
6.
Some years ago was told by friend into the BDSM thing that ultimately the submissive partner has control not the dominant partner. When I asked them to explain that statement they said by introducing a safe word such as "orange" or "dinosaur" the role play comes to an end instantly as the dominant partner has gone too far hence the submissive partner is neither comfortable with it or gaining pleasure from it. If you pay attention to people who have children or pets, you very quickly realise that the demanding child or pet quickly trains the parent/human to respond to its needs.
Therefore surely the dominant role of Daddy is just an illusion, as you are there to take care of baby's needs and can only hope to get whatever it is that you get out of the role play as long as baby is happy content and experiencing pleasure in that role?
Ultimately, doesn't the baby in fact have the most control?
ie if potty training, and baby wants to go back to her nappies, then she purposely has an accident so that you'll give her what she wants and put her back in a nappy. This scenario is frequently depicted so must obviously make both baby and dady happy - ie if Daddy gives baby what she wants = Daddy gets what he wants. (control?)
Email: