Posted by MyObservations on September 16, 2004 at 15:17 [208.243.250.79]
In Reply to: ROFL - Here's where the "truth", as you put it, co posted by Victoriah Nichole Little on September 14, 2004 at 10:29
I’m not taking sides here, just presenting things as I see them.
With regards to your first paragraph;
I agree that IMO’s use of quotation marks was incorrect. However, it appeared to me that IMO was paraphrasing. And, regardless of whether or not IMO was paraphrasing, IMO was speaking from a ‘first person’ prospective, and this would not be considered ‘hearsay’. Only third person prospective is considered hearsay.
With regards to your second paragraph;
I did not see, in any of IMO’s posts, that he accused you of anything. Certainly not in the post to which you are speaking of here.
I find it interesting, however, that his post to diaperboy seems to have struck a nerve with you.
With regards to your forth paragraph;
I feel you take things way to personally. I see this no matter where it is you post. If you were to let alot of these things roll off your back, you would be a much better person for it.
The fact that you continually correct people on the use of your name, tells them that you are bothered by the fact that they have used your name incorrectly. It really can’t be taken any other way.
With regards to your fifth paragraph;
Whether or not you and WingZ , or, Daily and Paul, have any kind of relationship, is not what I see as being the core element presented here. These relationships would be between consenting ‘adults’. What I gather from all of this is that you are having a relationship which involves a minor. And this is what those that have and are speaking out about, have a problem with. Myself included.
It doesn’t matter whether or not this relationship is benign. What matters is that this relationship also involves this fetish. And this is the point that IMO is trying to make, as I see it.
With regards to your sixth paragraph;
You say, you “know all these things”, in regards to information about Elizabeth. When I read this, and taking into consideration your other text, it appears to me that you are having some kind of relationship with Elizabeth, otherwise, you would not have this kind of information. Again, this is my take.
With regards to your last two paragraphs;
I do not feel that IMO’s intent was to try and destroy your forum.
It appeared to me that what IMO was trying to do is to make you and everyone else aware, as to how serious this matter could be. Do you know that if an adult were to give a minor something as simple as porn magazine, in most, if not all states, this would be considered, corrupting the morals of a minor?
I don’t feel that it’s the judgment of those involved in this fetish that you need to worry about, only the judgments of those that are not part of this fetish.
Email: