Posted by WingZ on September 14, 2004 at 13:36 [159.91.114.121]
In Reply to: Re: Quite.... posted by IMO on September 14, 2004 at 09:22
Well, if for nothing else, I'll commend you for at least being able to support your assertions. Allow me, however, to offer a counteranlysis:
- On the one hand, it is correct that Vickie cannot present this relationship as a harmless one and then claim people know nothing about it. The mere fact that she has acknowledged such a relationship and painted it in such away prevents her from disavowing it. However, the matter in question is not the existence of the relationship itself but the nature of said relationship. That nature remains unknown to most people, and yet they assume the worst to be true and criticize Vickie for it just as sure as if they had prior knowledge of it.
- Interesting assortment of facts, but I fail to see what they have to do with anything. I'm a 20 year old male. Have you any contention beyond that as far as I am concerned?
- "All this, be as it may - can you say, “corruption of the morals of a minor”? Because, at the very least, that’s what Elizabeth’s parents are going to say, should they find out."
Once again, you are speaking as if you know for fact that which you do not. Have you any psychic credentials we should be aware of?
- "And the sad part of this is, anyone who has been, or still is, an active participant on your forum, and is 18 or older, will also be implicated with you, should this ever come out into the main stream."
Let's try this concept on for size. What Vickie does effects Vickie. She sure as hell doesn't represent me or the ABDL community. If people misconstrue her actions for mine, the fault lies with them and not me inasmuch as the ignorance is theirs. Comprende?
- "The above facts are true."
Ah, the facts might be true, but your commentary, interpretation and juxtaposition of said facts is a matter of subjective opinion.
- "Now you, Wing, and whoever else wants to, can jump on my chest and say, “It’s none of your Damn business!”, and to a perverted degree, you would be right. On the other hand, however, I would love to hear what response the authorities give to such a rant, as you are being placed in the back seat of a patrol car. Or, better still, what response a Judge would give to such a rant."
Since you think this to be a legal issue, exactly what crime would you have Vickie charged with? And on what evidence?
The sad fact of the matter is that if Vickie really was a danger to children, I surely would not be making excuses for her. If anything, I'd be more vocally critical than any of you. Inasmuch as I have no real reason to believe that she is a danger (and neither do you, asmuch as it might pain you to admit it), I will have no part of her being slandered. Doing so only draws our attention from the real predators, the real dangers and the real threats. It is for that reason that I defend Vickie, not because I'm some kind of servile lapdog.